When I began preparing science curriculum, it was for a public Charlotte Mason style charter school that was expected to satisfy each of its state’s learning requirements. It was a rather interesting exercise to immerse myself in that state’s standards and then later to compare those to the NGSS standards. From the start, I had a negative attitude towards “requirements” of any kind, mostly because I don’t like being pushed around by anyone. I especially have a problem with the government having any say in my children’s education, and I take extra measures to ensure that they are never subjected to standardized tests. It’s one of the primary reasons we homeschool — to remove the government from my children’s education. But the charter school I was working for didn’t have that liberty, and it turns out, not all homeschooling families in the U.S. have that liberty either.
At first, I thought that the charter school might need to heavily supplement the living book based curriculum because I didn’t know how they could ever cover each of the state standards while reading a single book on a subject. I was quite wrong. It is simply amazing how much is covered by a living book, and because each detail is clothed in living ideas, you don’t need a whole page of facts to get the point across. In reality, the textbook may need to be longer than the living book when covering the same amount of material. To learn more about this idea, read my article Science Writing Can’t Survive on Charm Alone.
I also learned that the standards for science aren’t all that big of a deal. (Note that I am only talking about science here.) For example, high school chemistry only includes eleven standards and physics comprises 27 standards. Here are some examples: Continue reading